By now, you hopefully have gone through a spin qubit journey. In case you haven't, you can access it here. In this post, I wanted to talk a bit more about how this little game relates to quantum mechanics. Spoiler alert: everything you did with your box (with the lights turning on and off) was completely classical. That is, there was no quantum mechanics involved at all.
What's going on here? First, focus on the lightbulbs: there are 4 cases. Your light is on, your partner’s light is on, both are on, or neither are on. Each of these cases is equally likely. Most of the time during the game, you’re going to care about the left column, because 3 out of 4 times, that’s how the lights will be.
So, you already know that most of the time, you and your partner want to choose the same button. In fact, that’s exactly what you should do. Let’s say you and your partner choose a really boring strategy before you start the game: you’re both always going to choose red. Then, because the lights will turn on like the left column 3 out of 4 times, you’re almost guaranteed to win 3 times out of 4.
But remember the goal? It was to win more than 3 out of 4 times (or rather 6 out of 8, just to make it a bit more interesting). Is that possible? Can you and your partner decide ahead of time that you are going to use a strategy that will get you winning more than 6 times out of 8?
The sad answer is, no. You can’t. At least in terms of classical statistics. Play this game many many many many many … many times and you’ll never beat the 75% win rate. Sure, you might get lucky, but that luck won’t last.
A good question to ask is, “why should I care, especially if I’m not going to a casino based on quantum mechanics?” Turns out this little game is related to a very important result in quantum information.
I’m going to skip over a very lengthy mathematics interlude here, but for interested parties, I suggest these somewhat readable lecture notes or for the particularly daring, I suggest Chapter 2 Section 6 in Nielsen and Chuang’s textbook on Quantum Information.
An important word here is correlation. Roughly speaking, it’s a measure of how similarly two or more things behave. Say I saw a person and a dog on the street very far from me (so far that I wouldn’t be able to see a leash). If they’re moving together, it’s safe for me to say they’re probably connected in some way (like a leash). I can’t know for sure, but the evidence I have seems to suggest they are “correlated”.
This game tests your ability to correlate your choices with your partner’s choices. But...we didn’t let you talk to your partner during the game. So your choices aren’t actually correlated (like if there wasn’t a leash between the dog and the person). The question is whether you can trick someone into thinking the measurements are correlated.
The person to trick might be a bit...tricky, also, and change the rules on you; that’s where the lights come in. See, it would be easy to fool someone if you and your partner chose a pattern before. You could alternate every turn. Or worse, you could choose the same button every single time.
The way these slots work, you don't know how to win (that is you don't have all the information) until after you can't talk to your partner. So this game is designed to make you lose, and statistically speaking, it will. Unless you harness the power of quantum mechanics. The important quantum results are these:
That last part might have piqued your interest. Yes, this all does come back down to technology, and there’s good reason to believe that quantum computers will play an important role in the future. And while that’s cool and important and many people have already written about it, personally, I’m just happy playing with this little game. If you are interested in another, similar game, I recommend checking out Adam Becker's interactive webpage here. Just keep in mind that the house always wins!